Weaponization

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v.  DONALD J. TRUMP Amicus Curiae

On November 18, 2022, Attorney General Merrick B. Garland announced that he had appointed John L. Smith “to conduct the ongoing investigation referenced and described in the United States’ Response to Motion for Judicial Oversight and Additional Relief, Donald J. Trump v. United States, No. 9:22-CV-81294-AMC (S.D. Fla. Aug. 30, 2022).”

People of NY v Trump - AFPI Amicus on the Merits

AFPI believes that the court below erred when it summarily remanded Defendant-Appellant’s Second Notice of Removal without holding an evidentiary hearing. Congress intended removal for federal officials to be broadly construed to prevent state interference with federal operations and to ensure federal officials can vindicate their interests before a federal court. Proper consideration of the federal issues raised by Defendant-Appellant—presidential immunity doctrine and preemption—would have established good cause for removal.

A 10-Point Plan to End the Weaponization of Government

The ongoing misuse and abuse of governmental powers and institutions to target political and ideological opponents undermines the core principles of America First policies. This process weaponizes and politicizes our fundamental institutions of democracy and erodes public confidence in the equal application of the law. The America First Policy Institute (AFPI) has developed a 10-point plan for a fair, transparent, and accountable government that operates with integrity and serves the public interest. By establishing robust oversight mechanisms and fostering a culture of impartiality, these recommendations would protect the principles of democracy and ensure governmental power is not misused for partisan gain. AFPI’s vision is a government that serves the people, upholds the rule of law, and commits to fair and impartial justice for all Americans.

Rogue Prosecutor Removal Processes in the States

What is a Rogue Progressive Prosecutor? Rogue progressive prosecutors are elected officials who see themselves more as political activists than as unbiased enforcers of the law. They routinely exercise their power to enforce the law selectively, based on their personal views, rather than applying it consistently and impartially as written.

Biden And Harris’ ‘Bold Plan’ Will Usher In Democrat Party Authoritarian Rule